In This Month’s E-News: January 2024

The Department of Commerce and the National Institute of Standards and Technology are requesting comments on a “draft guidance framework designed to help federal agencies evaluate when it may be appropriate to exercise ‘march-in’ rights under the Bayh-Dole Act,” NIH announced. “March-in refers to a federal agency’s right to march-in and require the contractor, an assignee, or exclusive licensee of a federally funded subject invention to grant a license to a responsible applicant or applicants, upon terms that are reasonable under the circumstances, and if the contractor, assignee, or exclusive licensee refuses such request, to grant a license itself. Currently, an agency can exercise march-in rights only under four specific circumstances. To date, no agency has exercised its right to march-in,” the agency said Dec. 12.

 In a Dec. 8 announcement, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) explained that, for 40 years, “the Bayh-Dole Act has promoted the commercialization of federally funded research and technology by according the recipient of those funds the right to retain ownership and seek patents on those inventions,” but also noted the lack of action by agencies. “The draft framework released today encourages funding agencies to consider both the practical impact and the potential impact the use of march-in rights could have on the broader research and development (R&D) ecosystem. It guides agencies in assessing three overarching questions and provides eight hypothetical scenarios in which march-in could emerge, to demonstrate how an agency might apply the framework to its decision-making process,” USTPO said. The deadline for comments on the framework, published in the Dec. 8 Federal Register, is Feb. 6. (12/14/23)

Auditors for the National Science Foundation (NSF) Office of Inspector General (OIG) are recommending that NSF seek repayment of $7,870 in costs claimed among 92 NSF awards totaling $25.5 million that North Dakota State University (NDSU) expended from Nov. 1, 2019, to Oct. 31, 2022. The questioned amount was found after auditors tested more than $2.1 million in claimed costs. Auditors said one award was charged $6,351 “in lodging expenses for four participants whose participation in the conference did not benefit the NSF award,” which NDSU “confirmed it incorrectly charged the lodging expenses to this award.” Additionally, auditors questioned $579 in airfare charged to a February 2022 award and $940 for a principal investigator’s (PI) lodging.

This document is only available to subscribers. Please log in or purchase access


    Would you like to read this entire article?

    If you already subscribe to this publication, just log in. If not, let us send you an email with a link that will allow you to read the entire article for free. Just complete the following form.

    * required field